Hospital payment in the United States: An overview and discussion of current policy issues
نویسنده
چکیده
Payment policy in the United States since the introduction of the Medicare Program for the elderly and disabled populations in the 1960s has been evolving from providing little incentive for hospitals to contain costs to its current form, which creates an enormous incentive for cost containment. The Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) system implemented by Medicare for hospital payment in 1983 is viewed favorably in terms of slowing cost escalation of inpatient care, while maintaining quality and access. DRG payments are not fully prospective, in that payments depend on procedures and outlier payments. Medicare spending on hospitals has grown significantly more slowly than spending on other types of services. Implementation has required periodic adjustments with refinements for new technologies, capital costs, and teaching. The main problems with DRG payments are their incentives to contain costs can be too strong, there are incentives for selection, and they may encourage substitution of outpatient for inpatient care without facilitating care management. Two alternatives to DRG payments to hospitals are a Mixed Payment System and Capitation. Under a mixed system hospitals are paid partially prospectively and partially on the basis of actual costs. This has certain desirable incentive properties in bringing prices more in line with marginal costs without setting them to zero as they are in a fully prospective system. With capitation, payments to providers are made monthly that reflect expected, not actual costs. They have been adopted as an alternative prospective payment mechanism by the Medicare and by many private insurers. Because payments are independent of whether any health services are actually provided, capitated payments create superior incentives for agents to manage all forms of medical care. Risk adjustment is necessary in order to create appropriate incentives for providers to enroll and treat all types of patients without encouraging selection. Although a variety of risk adjustment formulas are used in the United States, the most widely used rely on diagnostic information from medical claims to adjust payments. The US Medicare program started using one such system, based on Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCGs) in 2000 to pay its managed care plans.
منابع مشابه
Ethical Agreement and Disagreement about Obesity Prevention Policy in the United States
An active area of public health policy in the United States is policy meant to promote healthy eating, reduce overconsumption of food, and prevent overweight/obesity. Public discussion of such obesity prevention policies includes intense ethical disagreement. We suggest that some ethical disagreements about obesity prevention policies can be seen as rooted in a common concern with equality or w...
متن کاملEthical Standards to Guide the Development of Obesity Policies and Programs; Comment on “Ethical Agreement and Disagreement about Obesity Prevention Policy in the United States”
The recent report by Barnhill and King about obesity prevention policy raises important issues for discussion and analysis. In response, this article raises four points for further consideration. First, a distinction between equality and justice needs to be made and consistently maintained. Second, different theories of justice highlight one additional important source of disagreement about the...
متن کاملAppraising the Foreign Policy Legacy of George W. Bush on Iran: The Roots of the Current Crisis
In this historical analysis of US foreign policy toward Iran during the presidency of George W. Bush, the author aims to decipher the overarching policy approach guiding United States' Iran policy in the context of the main issues arising during this time period. George W. Bush started his presidency with the legacy of past presidents, viewing Iran as a threat to US interests and drawing from t...
متن کاملUnintended Consequences of Hospital Payment: The Case of Swiss Diagnosis Related Groups
Background: In 2012, Switzerland changed from retrospective to prospective hospital payment based on diagnosis related groups (DRGs), following the example of the United States, Australia, and Germany. As in these countries, the objective of this transition was to motivate hospitals to improve efficiency by making them bear financial risk to some extent.Objective:...
متن کاملTwo Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Flaws in Alternatives to Fee-for-Service Payment Plans Do Not Mean Fee-for-Service Is a Good Solution to Rising Prices; Comment on “Fee-for-Service Payment - An Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?”
Professor Naoki Ikegami’s “Fee-for-service payment – an evil practice that must be stamped out” summarizes many of the failings of alternatives to fee-for-service (FFS) payment systems. His article also offers several suggestions for improving FFS systems. However, even powerful arguments against many of the alternatives to FFS, does not make a convincing argument for FFS systems. In addition, ...
متن کامل